Well... the definition of art is a can of worms that I wasn't trying to open, so if it helps to just substitute "images that I can personally enjoy looking at in similar ways to how I can enjoy art" for "art" in this piece, feel free. But, I would also say that there are such things as aleatory techniques used by humans that I think count as creativity— or even if they don't, I can still appreciate the results of them— and AIs could be seen as a very indirect example. And the ingredients they're using had intention.
I'm also not trying to imply that "AI" means anything like a real intelligence in this context. "Machine learning" would be more accurate.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: yes, and no; and yes, but no ...
2022-09-18 07:23 (UTC)I'm also not trying to imply that "AI" means anything like a real intelligence in this context. "Machine learning" would be more accurate.